Learning Engagement in a Time of Zoom Fatigue

Along with hand-washing, disinfecting, and social distancing, Zoom has become part of life for many during the pandemic. The platform, along with other video services, has been a lifeline for those working, learning, socializing, exercising, and worshipping from home. However — for many of us — the initial thrill of seeing distant colleagues on video conferences has given way to fatigue, anxiety, and distraction as we struggle to stay engaged. This level of disengagement is worrying for any aspect of business, but is especially concerning for the success of workplace learning.
What is going on? According to Stanford professor, Jeremy Bailenson, three dynamics are at play that differentiate an in-person meeting from a video conference. First, we experience non-verbal overload.
Interactions we usually reserve for intimate relationships, such as periods of extended gaze and faces up close, are now the norm for hours of meetings every day.
Second, the “constant gaze” we experience is draining. While this dynamic works well for productivity when full attention is required, it is nonetheless uncomfortable. Finally, we experience loss of personal space. When we meet in the real world, we have opportunities to adjust how and where we sit so that we can be more comfortable, relative to the speaker and other participants, as well as to screens and whiteboards. That control goes away in a video conference when you’re tethered to your screen at a specific distance, and is compounded by the lack of control over your physical surroundings, which are often shared with family, roommates, and pets.
In the rush to move operations online, learning can get left behind. As leaders retreat to command and control in a time of crisis, workplace learning gets pushed down the list of priorities. When learning is addressed, the response too often is the hasty introduction of an online platform that emphasizes business continuity over actual learning. Setting up a Zoom account and attempting business as usual can defeat the very purpose of learning new ways to cope and succeed in a distributed work environment. This results in what Susan Grajek of Educause, the association of education technologists, describes as a “quick, ad hoc, low-fidelity mitigation strategy” that cannot compare with “well-considered, durable online learning.”
INSEAD researchers have identified two common mistakes business leaders tend to make in the quick transition to online-based learning, which go against best practices for workplace learning. First of these is a fixation on mechanics as leaders obsess about how to replicate in-person training and focus more on how they communicate instructions to workers and less on how to empower employees to learn together.
The other trap that awaits learning leaders in the move online is a retreat to thinking about learning as a purely cognitive endeavor.
Learning gets reduced to information-sharing, leaving out the social and emotional aspects of authentic learning experiences.
This can be dangerous at a time when we are all experiencing some level of socio-emotional distress and trying to figure out how to move ahead with our lives.
There’s a dated assumption that only cognitive learning is possible online. However, organizations have demonstrated success in building capabilities online that encompass the social and emotional as well as the cognitive aspects of learning. Strategic capabilities such as leadership, design thinking, and digital transformation all require mastery of new information and technologies. But they also require new mindsets and ways to learn and work together.
For these efforts to be successful requires a focus not just on the content of learning but also on establishing learning environments that are learner-centered and psychologically safe.
Learner-centered environments accommodate the learning preferences and needs of the learner. In online learning, this can mean enabling asynchronous participation in discussions and collaborative projects that require social interaction. This allows the learner to proceed through the experience at their own pace, while still getting the benefits of collaboration. For many, this type of learning allows people to spend some “alone time” with the material and overcome inhibitions that may arise when responding to unfamiliar or uncomfortable material.
Another fundamental element of successful learning environments is psychological safety.
In safe learning environments, learners can be more reflective and open to constructive criticism.
Practice and roleplay come more naturally in the presence of trusted colleagues and coaches. Candid conversations about sensitive work topics presume some level of confidentiality. In the physical world, we can generally create these safe environments with a door and a few simple ground rules. That sense of safety is hard to recreate in a video conference when you’re facing a wall of faces and dealing with whatever is going on in your physical space at the same time. In some instances safety can be achieved by allowing for written reflections. In others, it may involve allowing for practice to happen when the kids are in bed or after you’ve had a chance to get out for a walk.
The move from classroom training to online collaborative learning does require a shift in how learning is designed and practiced. However, the shift is not as daunting as it may seem. Moving in-person workshops online can be achieved in four steps:
If the purpose of your training session is to simply share information and can be conducted in 60-90 minutes, video conferencing may be perfectly adequate for online training programs. If the training is strategically important and involves learners engaging with each other in sustained efforts to build capabilities, additional learning modalities may be required. This does not rule out synchronous video conference sessions within extended learning experiences — these can always bring value through convening and focusing attention. However, by spreading the learning over a range of interaction types, the stress on learners can be reduced, resulting in higher engagement and ultimately better business outcomes.
Blog
Discover why having a trusted innovation training partner and the right technology helps organizations embrace design thinking.
Blog
Learn about the differences between Agile and Design Thinking, and how they complement each other in creating customer-centric and innovative solutions. From our partners at ExperiencePoint.
Blog
In an ongoing series, we will explore onboarding initiatives centered around the six key pillars of learning on NovoEd: Practice & Application, Discussion & Feedback, Mentors & Managers, Effective Facilitation, Team-Based Learning, and Curated & Goal-Aligned Content.
Blog
In an ongoing series, we will explore onboarding initiatives centered around the six key pillars of learning on NovoEd: Practice & Application, Discussion & Feedback, Mentors & Managers, Effective Facilitation, Team-Based Learning, and Curated & Goal-Aligned Content.
Blog
In an ongoing series, we will explore onboarding initiatives centered around the six key pillars of learning on NovoEd: Practice & Application, Discussion & Feedback, Mentors & Managers, Effective Facilitation, Team-Based Learning, and Curated & Goal-Aligned Content.
Blog
With a forward-thinking approach to digital learning transformation, companies expand skills organization-wide, driving innovation and operational imperatives.