Online Course Completion Rates Strategy

Completion rates in online courses are generally low, averaging around 13%. This poses a challenge to course designers, who are responsible for the success of online learners but have had few tools for influencing their behavior. A promising solution comes from our study on the effect of social networks in eLearning. The key finding is that students who participate in virtual teams are 5x more engaged and 16x more likely to finish an online course.
We considered the performance of students enrolled in Technology Entrepreneurship, an eight-week MOOC offered in the summer of 2013 on NovoEd. Of the 23,577 students who worked individually, only 2% finished the course. By contrast, of the 2,671 students in teams, 32% graduated. Completion rates were greater for teams with mentors, which achieved 44% completion (see Figure 1). Those choosing to join teams might be more engaged, however, consistent results held even when we controlled for planned and actual initial engagement with the course.
The data testifies to the power of felt accountability, a feeling of social obligation that arises when learners are beholden to others. We surmise that learners in teams tend to hold themselves and each other accountable for their performance, leading to improved completion rates and greater engagement. That’s why team-based learners sign in 5x more often than learners without teams, a 26% higher level of activity (see Figure 2).
The effect is amplified in courses where the majority of learners are enrolled in teams. It is noteworthy that, in courses held on the NovoEd platform, course completion rates are as high as 95% when team participation is greatest.
These initial findings present a powerful argument for designing MOOCs around team-based assignments. Download the white paper by clicking here.
Chuck Eesley is an Assistant Professor of Management Science and Engineering at Stanford University.
If you enjoyed this content, be sure to read our Best Practices For Virtual Teams article.
Blog
With functions and industries evolving so rapidly due to the role of AI, hundreds of millions of workers will need to be reskilled with future-oriented abilities. We asked more than 500 professionals about the expectations for today’s learning experience and their thoughts on the future. Here are 5 key findings of the primary insights gleaned from our research.
Blog
Cohort-based programs provide better learning outcomes in difficult-to-teach domains like management and leadership, but are difficult to scale. Here are some practical tips on using a cohort-based learning platform to impart capabilities to a large and distributed team.
Blog
Discover why having a trusted innovation training partner and the right technology helps organizations embrace design thinking.
Blog
Learn about the differences between Agile and Design Thinking, and how they complement each other in creating customer-centric and innovative solutions. From our partners at ExperiencePoint.
Blog
In an ongoing series, we will explore onboarding initiatives centered around the six key pillars of learning on NovoEd: Practice & Application, Discussion & Feedback, Mentors & Managers, Effective Facilitation, Team-Based Learning, and Curated & Goal-Aligned Content.
Blog
In an ongoing series, we will explore onboarding initiatives centered around the six key pillars of learning on NovoEd: Practice & Application, Discussion & Feedback, Mentors & Managers, Effective Facilitation, Team-Based Learning, and Curated & Goal-Aligned Content.